The art of decision-making: Eisenhower’s D-Day strategy
How General Eisenhower's thoughtful approach and mindful pauses reveal timeless principles for effective leadership and decision-making
The biggest strategic decisions we face can have a momentous impact on our lives. How often, in our busy, overscheduled lives, do we take the time to pause and just think?
Eighty years ago, General Dwight Eisenhower gathered with his staff at Southwick House, a Georgian mansion near Portsmouth, serving as the military headquarters for the Allied Expeditionary Force. As Supreme Allied Commander, the full weight and responsibility for the impending D-Day invasion rested upon his shoulders.
Eisenhower described the invasion force embedded in the surrounding area as “a great human spring, coiled for the moment when its energy should be released, and it would vault the English Channel in the greatest amphibious assault ever attempted.”
Countless hours of planning and millions of individual decisions had led up to this moment. The aircraft were organized and stationed, the navy was positioned, troops were equipped and trained.
By early June of 1944, Eisenhower felt the only remaining great decision to be faced before D-Day was that of fixing definitely the day and hour of the assault. This was, by no means, an easy decision. Clear skies and a full moon were critical for the success of the paratrooper landing beyond enemy lines the night before. In addition, moderate seas in the Channel were important for the amphibious crossing, and the invasion had to be synchronized with the tides.
In early June, all three factors – the moon, the tides and the weather – were moving favorably toward a window of opportunity. After much deliberation it was decided that June 5 was to be the day. Eisenhower wrote, “We must go unless there is a real and serious deterioration in the weather.”
On the morning of June 4, Eisenhower and his staff were confronted with exactly that – a very serious deterioration in the weather. A powerful barometric system was moving toward the British Isles. The good news was that it was set to blow through quickly. The report called for clear weather on the evening of June 5 and all day on June 6. Because June 6 was still within the window of opportunity, a decision was made to push the date back one day. D-Day was now set for June 6.
Later that same day, on the evening of June 4, Eisenhower received an updated weather report. A second system looked likely to hit Normandy on June 7.
This time, moving the date back a few days was not an option. Eisenhower was facing a momentous decision.
If he went forward with the invasion on June 6, he might get the initial troops on shore, but the weather could prevent the reinforcement troops from arriving on June 7. The invasion force might get pushed back into the Channel before the Allies even had a chance to gain a foothold.
Yet if he delayed the invasion by a single day, the window of opportunity would close, and the next possible date permitted by the moon and tides wasn’t until June 19. With 150,000 troops poised on the brink of invasion – with the spring tightly coiled – the thought of delaying the launch another two weeks was daunting. In addition, there was the risk that the Germans would uncover the operation and have time to fortify their defenses.
Eisenhower paused. In silence, he walked over to a window and stared out at the wind and rain that was pelting the entire Portsmouth area.
The decisions most of us make are nowhere near as consequential as what Eisenhower was facing that stormy June evening in Portsmouth, yet that doesn’t take away from the fact that the biggest strategic decisions we face can have a momentous impact on our lives. How often, in our busy, overscheduled lives, do we take the time to pause and just think?
By this point in the war, Eisenhower had developed a practice of taking time to silently ponder decisions, often using the solitude to write down his thoughts. Earlier in the war, on the eve of the invasion of North Africa, Eisenhower wrote a ten-point memo titled, Worries of a Commander, listing all the elements of the impending invasion that gave him cause for concern. He wrote a similar memo the week before D-Day.
Eisenhower understood there was information that was unknown, and factors that were outside of his control. Yet, in the face of such uncertainty and complexity, a decision must be made, and the responsibility fell upon him.
As Eisenhower’s chief of staff observed the general silently looking out the window in Southwick House, he was struck by “the loneliness and isolation of a commander at a time when such a momentous decision was to be taken by him, with full knowledge that success or failure rests on his individual decision.”
Finally, after a long pause, Eisenhower broke the silence: “I’m quite positive that the order must be given.”
The following morning, June 5, with the boats steaming toward France, but not so far along that they couldn’t be turned back, Eisenhower had one more opportunity to consider his decision. The weather report that morning had not improved, but it had not deteriorated either.
He gathered his staff and solicited their opinions one last time, listening carefully to each person. Then he sat silently on the sofa pondering the decision and going over the factors in his head.
Five long minutes passed. It must have felt like an eternity to Eisenhower’s staff.
Finally, he gave the order: “okay, let’s go.” There was no turning back.
Few of us will likely ever have to make a decision as far-reaching as what Eisenhower faced in World War II, but we can learn from how he approached his decision-making.
Shortly after, the room emptied, and Eisenhower sat down at his desk to compose a press release to be used should the invasion fail. The press release is a masterclass in accountability, and it reveals the psychological mindset and disposition of a leader confronted with a consequential decision in the face of uncertainty:
“Our landings in the Cherbourg-Havre area have failed to gain a satisfactory foothold, and I have withdrawn the troops. My decision to attack at this time and place was based on the best information available. The troops, the air and navy did all that Bravery and devotion to duty could do. If any blame or fault attaches to the attempt, it is mine alone.”
Few of us will likely ever have to make a decision as far-reaching as what Eisenhower faced in World War II, but we can learn from how he approached his decision-making. He gathered the best minds around himself, and he tapped into their expertise. He wrote in his journal to “crystalize his thoughts” and stabilize himself emotionally. He left behind numerous notes and memos that were never meant for any official purpose other than to distill his own thoughts. And when it came time to make the biggest decisions, he paused and took time to think.
Eisenhower understood that his decision would not have all the results he desired, so he prepared for all outcomes. But he also had a high level of confidence in the process. Whether D-Day was a success or failure, he was at peace that decision – which was his alone – was “based on the best information possible.”
Learn more about making better and more efficient decisions in Decision Mojo, an intensive learning laboratory for building great decision-makers.
Sources:
- Lead Yourself First. Kethledge, Raymond M. and Erwin, Michael S.
- Supreme Commander, Ambrose, Stephen E.
- Crusade in Europe, Eisenhower, Dwight D.
(Artwork is AI-generated.)
- How Nike’s new CEO is helping employees make better decisions - November 5, 2024
- Darwin on decision-making: 2 techniques that will help your skills evolve - October 11, 2024
- A decision process gone wrong, and what we can learn from it - August 27, 2024